Digital Transactions Authoritative, insightful and timely information for payments professionals
- Backers of the so-called SegWit2x proposal to double block size for Bitcoin suspended the effort on Wednesday, citing a lack of “consensus for a clean blocksize upgrade.” The move, which would have occurred around Nov. 16, was an effort to increase transaction capacity for Bitcoin and relieve upward pressure on transaction fees.
- CPI Card Group Inc. reported that its net U.S. sales of credit and debit cards were $39.3 million in the third quarter, down 20% from a year earlier. The card manufacturer attributed the decline to slowing demand from payment card issuers for EMV chip cards, lower card prices, and a $3.6 million decrease in card personalization and fulfillment services revenue.
- Mitek Systems Inc., a provider of mobile remote deposit capture and other mobile-imaging software, reported that revenues in its fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 ended Sept. 30 increased 33% year over year to $12.9 million. Net income excluding a one-time tax benefit rose 91% to $1.8 million. Full-year revenue increased 31% year over year to $45.4 million and net income excluding the tax benefit rose 56% to $3.1 million.
- Class-action administrator Angeion Group has used Checkbook.io, provider of a blockchain-based digital-check service, to send thousands of settlement checks so far that otherwise would have been paper checks sent by mail, according to Checkbook.io.
- Payments-security provider Bluefin Payment Systems launched a service enabling partners of its Decryptx encryption service to be included under Bluefin’s point-to-point encryption listing on the PCI Security Standards Council Web site.
- Web-hosting giant GoDaddy Inc. announced two integrations with Square Inc. aimed at providing online-payments and booking services for its clients.
- Xtime, which offers retention software for automobile dealers, has incorporated payments capability from Vantiv Inc.’s Integrated Payments unit for a tablet-based check-in and check-out function for service departments.
- Mobile-banking applications pose a greater risk than mobile-payment apps because the banking apps aren’t subjected to the common security standards that govern the payments apps, warns joint research from Inside Secure and UL.
Related Articles
Check Also
The Electronic Payments Coalition Weighs in on a Lawsuit Challenging Illinois’s Interchange Law
The Electronic Payments Coalition late Wednesday filed an Amicus brief on behalf of the plaintiffs …