Category: News

  • AI, Interchange, And Open Finance Are the Top Prospective 2025 Payments Trends

    AI, Interchange, And Open Finance Are the Top Prospective 2025 Payments Trends

    The outlook for payments in 2025 will be rife with open finance, instant payments, multi-rail payments, interchange questions, and the increasing use of artificial intelligence, observers suggest.

    The top three payments trends next year will be open finance, instant payments adoption, and point-of-sale innovations, says Capgemini Research Institute in its “Capgemini Financial Services Top Trends 2025” report.

    Already a hot topic, open finance will emerge with a broader scope than open banking, which enables consumer portability of select financial-account information, opening the door for easier access to many types of financial accounts and payment services, the report notes. Open finance expands this scope to include a “360-degree financial footprint” that includes accounts like insurance, investments, and retirement holdings, Capgemini says. 

    Talbott: “We’re also very engaged on the interchange issue at the state level.”

    An enabler will be standards imposed by regulators, with Capgemini pointing out the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s recent Section 1033 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 requires banks to share customer data in a standardized format with authorized third parties.

    Instant payments are available in many forms, including persont-to-person payments, and are forecast to grow from 16% of global payment transaction volume to 22% in 2028, according to Capgemini’s “World Payments Report 2025.”

    The report also found that instant account-to-account payments could offset 15% to 25% of future card transaction volume growth, with debit and prepaid cards potentially most affected.

    The impact could be transformational. “With instant payments favored over checks and debit cards, banks stand to benefit from lower transaction costs. Shifting small purchases to instant, low-cost account-to-account (A2A) payments, achieved through bypassing intermediaries (like card networks), may stimulate micropayment adoption among consumers,” Capgemini says in its 2025 outlook.

    In addition to largely commercial instant payments made with services from The Clearing House Payments Co. LLC’s RTP network and FedNow from the Federal Reserve, other instant or near-instant payment services abound. Zelle from Early Warning Services LLC targets P2P payments and both Mastercard Inc. and Visa Inc. offer speedy payment services via Mastercard Send and Visa Direct. Earlier this month, Visa announced plans to speed up Visa Direct transactions to less than a minute, beginning for U.S. users in April. 

    Expect a big push for point-of-sale technology, both online and in store, in 2025, Capgemini says. Technologies like softPOS, which uses an app on a consumer-grade phone or tablet instead of a dedicated POS terminal, will find more favor among merchants for their low maintenance costs and “minimal upfront investment,” the report says. “Customer flexibility improves from more payment choices like digital wallets or split payments through financing options such as buy now/pay later (BNPL). In addition to traditional payment choices (cards, cash), merchants can reduce abandoned orders and boost revenues.”

    Specific to acquiring, the use of artificial intelligence services, already deployed for fraud-prevention measures, will have an even wider a focus in 2025, says Scott Talbott, executive vice president at the Electronic Transactions Association, a Washington, D.C.-based acquiring trade organization. Digital assets and privacy issues will assume a higher priority, also, he says. 

    For its part, the ETA is eying three themes in 2025, starting with how payments help power the economy and how they enable small businesses to grow and serve their customers. Another component is how payments enable consumers at all income levels to conduct their financial transactions.

    “We’re also very engaged on the interchange issue at the state level ,” Talbott says.

  • An Injunction Against Illinois’s Interchange Law Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory

    An Injunction Against Illinois’s Interchange Law Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory

    United States District Court Judge Virginia Kendell granted a preliminary injunction late Friday that provides banks some relief from the pending Illinois Interchange Prohibition Fee Act, but also gives merchants reason to cheer.

    Kendell, who is overseeing a lawsuit filed against the IIFPA, ruled the injunction applies only to financial institutions regulated by the National Bank Act and Homeowners Credit Loan Act, not issuers with Illinois state banking charters, nor the Visa and Mastercard networks. The latter part of her opinion is why merchant organizations are claiming victory.

    Kendell’s ruling sent attorneys for plaintiffs and defendants scrambling to analyze the potential impact of the injunction on the payments industry, should the ruling stand.

    The court will hear additional arguments Jan. 15 for extending the injunction to cover federally chartered credit unions and other entities likely to be adversely affected by the IIFPA. The IIFPA exempts Illinois merchants from paying interchange on sales tax and gratuities levied on credit and debit card transactions.

    While plaintiffs in the case “welcomed” the partial relief the injunction provided for “national banks and federal savings associations,” they were quick to note the injunction left other parties that will be affected by the law seeking relief.

    “We look forward to answering the judge’s questions to ensure that this relief applies to all financial institutions involved in the Illinois payment system, so the customers they serve will also be protected from the harm [the] IFPA will cause if it is allowed to move forward,” say the American Bankers Association, Illinois Bankers Association, America’s Credit Unions, and the Illinois Credit Union League in a statement.

    On the flipside, organizations representing merchants called the decision a win, as the injunction does not cover the Visa and Mastercard networks.

    “We’re heartened by today’s ruling, as the judge clearly states credit card networks like Visa and Mastercard must comply with this law, which will provide tangible relief to Illinois families and retailers by limiting the fees that can be charged on the tax and tips portion of transactions,” Rob Karr, president and chief executive of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, which lobbied for passage of the IIFPA, says in a statement.

    Nationally, merchant organizations are confident Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc., which set interchange fees, will have to comply with the law.

    “The law will go forward with respect to Visa and Mastercard,” says Doug Kantor, general counsel for the National Association of Convenience Stores, which earlier this year petitioned the court to join the IIFPA lawsuit as a defendant. “There will be another hearing and maybe some appeals, but for now it is clear Visa and Mastercard, which set interchange rates, will have to comply with the law,” when it goes into effect next July.

    Kantor argues that, once the law takes effect, the card networks will need to have processes in place that exempt from interchange sales tax and tips for any card purchases made in Illinois.

    Opponents of the IIFPA counter that argument is flawed because, as networks, Visa and Mastercard do not collect interchange, acquirers do. IIFPA opponents also argue that if the injunction stands and the law goes into effect, it will create a two-tiered system in which processors will have to exempt interchange for state-chartered banks on sales tax and tips, but not for nationally chartered banks.

    Such a system would also put state-charted banks at a financial disadvantage, as they would not be able to collect interchange revenue on sales tax and tips, while nationally chartered banks operating in the state can, opponents argue.

    “Applying the law to parts of the interconnected payment system and not others would create political and practical problems” says Scott Talbott, executive vice president for the Electronic Transactions Association. “The ruling is a clear indication that the underlying law is so problematic that its needs to be scrapped.”

    While some Illinois legislators have floated the idea of tweaking the IIFPA to make it more palatable to card issuers, the Illinois Bankers Association has stated its preference is that the law be overturned, as it would create too much disruption in payments in Illinois.

  • Fiserv Snaps up Payfare for Embedded Payments; Mastercard Closes on Recorded Future

    Fiserv Snaps up Payfare for Embedded Payments; Mastercard Closes on Recorded Future

    Fiserv Inc. is looking to beef up its capabilities in embedded payments with an agreement to acquire Payfare Inc., a Toronto-based company, for $201.5 million Canadian, or approximately $139 million in U.S. currency.

    The deal, which was announced early Monday and is subject to shareholder approval, comes as processors look to build or acquire capabilities in relatively new and growing fields such as earned-wage access.

    The announcement also reflects mounting interest n the payments industry this year in locking in new capabilities quickly via acquisitions. There have been 77 deals so far, ahead of the pace seen in 2023, when there had been 72 combinations by this time, according to data compiled by TSG, formerly The Strawhecker Group.

    The pricetag for Payfare comes at a 90% premium to the company’s closing price on Toronto Stock Excchange, the company said early Monday in announcing the deal with Fiserv.

    “Our Board conducted a thorough strategic review process together with our financial advisors, having evaluated numerous acquisition, commercial partnership, and other opportunities, and concluded that the transaction is in the best interests of the company, its various stakeholders, and its shareholders, with certainty of value with an all-cash offer,” Marco Margiotta, Payfare’s chief executive and founding partner, said in a statement. “This transaction represents tangible recognition of the value and strength of what Payfare has built as we embark on this exciting new chapter.”

    Observers see a strong rationale behind the deal. “Fiserv is an industrial-strength scale provider of traditional processing to banks and merchants. It’s more likely to acquire new capabilities than to develop them inhouse,” notes Eric Grover, principal at the payments advisory Intrepid Ventures. “Payfare will enrich its ability to provide payments to the burgeoning gig economy and hourly workers living paycheck-to-paycheck.”

    For his part, Fiserv CEO Frank Bisignano hailed the deal as an accelerator for Fiserv’s efforts to support embedded-finance capabilities. The market is expected to generate $7 trillion in volume by 2026, up from $2.1 trillion in 2021, according to projections from Bain & Co. Bisignano is expected to leave Fiserv to take up an appointment by the incoming Trump admistration to run the Social Security Administration.

    In related news, Mastercard Inc. on Friday announced it has closed on its $2.65-billion deal for Recorded Future, a cyberthreat intelligence platform based on artificial intelligence. The deal was announced in September. The seller, Insight Partners, assumed a controlling interest in the company in 2019.

    The deal comes as payments companies look to shore up defenses against a rising tide of fraud threats, particularly in e-commerce. “Adding Recorded Future’s AI-driven threat- intelligence capabilities to our cybersecurity services, identity solutions, and real-time fraud scoring will enable us to better support our customers in these efforts,” said Johan Gerber, executive vice president for security solutions at Mastercard, in a statement.

  • CFPB Sues Walmart, Branch and other Digital Transactions News briefs from 12/23/24

    CFPB Sues Walmart, Branch and other Digital Transactions News briefs from 12/23/24

    • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has sued Walmart Inc. and Branch Messenger Inc. over allegations of fees for transferring earnings made by individuals in the Walmart Spark Driver program. The CFPB alleges Walmart forced delivery drivers to use Branch deposit accounts. To move funds from these accounts to another drivers faced “a complex process to access their funds, and when they finally did, they face further delays or fees if they need to transfer the money they earned into an account of their choice,” the CFPB said.
    • U.S. spending for the 2024 holidays rose 4.8% compared to the same period last year, according to research from Visa Inc.’s Retail Spend Monitor, a product of Visa Consulting & Analytics. The increase, for which an absolute figure was not immediately available, stemmed from all forms of payments, including cash and check, and was not adjusted for inflation.
    • E-commerce platform WooCommerce completed an integration with buy now, pay later provider Klarna AB to enable it as a default payment method.
    • U.S. consumers spend on average $362 per month on utility bills, up 3% from 2023, according to doxo’s U.S. Utilities Market Size and Household Spend Report for 2024.
    • Stablecoin platform Tether has agreed to invest $775 million in Rumble, a videosharing provider. The parties expect the deal to close in the first quarter.
    • Varo Bank, a digital national bank, said it will enable no-fee deposits at more than 7,500 CVS pharmacies through an agreement with Green Dot Corp.
    • Pickleball Kingdom, which has granted approximately 400 indoor franchises for indoor pickleball, has agreed to adopt payments and reservations technology from PodPlay Technologies.
  • WooCommerce Makes Affirm Its Go-To BNPL Provider

    WooCommerce Makes Affirm Its Go-To BNPL Provider

    WooCommerce is making Affirm Holdings Inc. its default buy now, pay later payment option, the e-commerce platform provider announced early Thursday.

    WooCommerce has offered Affirm as a payment option since 2015. In 2022, WooCommerce began offering Affirm to its merchants in Canada. 

    As part of the deal, eligible merchants will offer Affirm’s Pay in 30 model, which the BNPL provider debuted earlier this year. That model allows consumers to pay for a purchase in full within 30 days. Affirm also offers biweekly and monthly installment plans from three to 60 months.

    Making Affirm the default BNPL payment option on WooCommerce is expected to broaden Affirm’s reach, especially among small and midsize businesses. It will also enable merchants to offer the payment option across a wider range of transactions, including smaller cart sizes, and make flexible payment plans available to more online shoppers, the two companies say.

    Since January, WooCommerce has seen the number of merchants offering Affirm as a payment option increase 45%. In addition, merchants offering Affirm have seen an increase in average order value, compared to those that don’t offer Affirm.

    “We know how much our customers value choice, flexibility, and transparency at checkout, which is something Affirm’s solutions uniquely provide,” says Benjamin De Castro, chief marketing officer for Gardyn, a retailer of indoor gardening systems, in a statement. “Offering Affirm through WooCommerce allows us to deliver a best-in-class checkout experience—one that helps us better meet our customers’ needs and, in doing so, accelerates our growth.”

  • The CFPB Sues Early Warning, BofA, Chase, And Wells Over Zelle Fraud

    The CFPB Sues Early Warning, BofA, Chase, And Wells Over Zelle Fraud

    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau early Friday said it has sued Early Warning Services LLC as well as Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo, alleging the Zelle person-to-person payments network failed to protect consumers against fraud. The banks are three of the seven financial institutions that own Early Warning, the company that operates Zelle.

    In its suit, some of which is redacted, the CFPB levels 10 counts against the defendants and asks the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona to permanently enjoin the defendants from committing what the bureau says were violations of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, Regulation E, and the Consumer Financial Protection Act. The suit asks for monetary relief but does not specify an amount.

    Some 143 million U.S. consumers and small businesses use Zelle, according to Early Warning.

    Representatives of two of the three defendant banks did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Digital Transactions News. A representative of Wells Fargo deferred to Early Warning, which issued a statement calling the CFPB’s suit “legally and factually flawed.”  Zelle “leads the fight against scams and fraud and has industry-leading reimbursement policies that go above an beyond the law,” the statement says.

    “We have made every effort to engage and cooperate with the CFPB on this matter,” the statement says, “however, they fail to acknowledge Zelle is an essential part of protecting Americans from fraud and scam due to our highly effective, multilayered fraud and scam countermeasures.” The bureau also “fails to acknowledge our consumer reimbursement policies that already go beyond legal and regulatory requirements.”

    The statement cites figures indicating reports of scams and fraud dropped nearly by half last year, despite a 27% rise in transactions. Some 99.5% of payments were sent on the network “without a report of scams and fraud,” the statement says.

    Zelle, which Early Warning launched in 2017 to compete with services such as PayPal Holdings Inc. and its Venmo network, has been the subject of controversy for several years over scams in which users allege they were gulled into transferring funds to fraudsters.

    Controversy over Early Warning’s response to scams on Zelle erupted in 2022 and led to demands from Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and seven other U.S. Senators for more information from Early Warning regarding fraud and scams on the network. Last year, banks in the network began issuing refunds to consumers who had been duped by fraudsters into sending money.

    Besides the three defendants in the CFPB suit, Early Warning is owned by Capital One, PNC Bank, Truist, and U.S. Bank. It could not be immediately determined why the CFPB omitted these other owners from its suit.

  • GiveCard’s Prepaid Role in Guaranteed Income program and other Digital Transactions News briefs from 12/20/24

    GiveCard’s Prepaid Role in Guaranteed Income program and other Digital Transactions News briefs from 12/20/24

    • The city of El Monte, Calif., has extended its agreement with GiveCard, a prepaid debit card platform, to manage the city’s Guaranteed Income pilot program, which embraces 125 low-income participants.
    • Togetherwork, a payments provider specializing in pet-care businesses, has acquired Petexec, a software provider for the same market. Terms were not announced.
    • The fintech Aghanim launched Instant Payouts, a platform for immediate payments to mobile-game developers.
    • Justt, a provider of chargeback management based on artificial intelligence, has closed on a $30-million Series C funding round led by Zeev Ventures. The round brings Justt’s total funding to $100 million.
    • Alchemy Pay, a gateway for cryptocurrency transactions, has registered under the Ramp Provider Program at Visa Inc. The program sets rules for third-party agents to facilitate fiat-to-crypto conversions.
  • Optimizing payments and financial services to exceed consumer expectations and maximize revenue

    Optimizing payments and financial services to exceed consumer expectations and maximize revenue

    Steven Velasquez, Senior Vice President and Head of Partner Business Development – Elavon, Inc.

    As payments technology innovation continues to evolve exponentially, today’s consumers expect a seamless, connected, and personalized buying experience. Buyers don’t care about payments per se, but the overall shopping experience. ISOs and ISVs that understand this are well-positioned for success in an increasingly competitive marketplace.

    The consumer demand for a truly holistic experience is evident in the growth of the embedded finance market. According to Grand View Research, the global embedded finance market clocked in at USD 83.32 billion in size in 2023 and projections estimate a compound annual growth rate of 32.8% from 2024 to 2030.

    Those that can offer more value around the payments experience stand to develop ‘stickier’ customer relationships while gaining valuable insight into their buying behavior. So, what should ISOs and ISVs look for in a long-term payments partner? Here are some important considerations.

    Building a superior consumer experience with powerful APIs

    When building your long-term growth strategy, future-forward payment software solutions that include enhanced money movement capabilities, quick access to banking data, and world-class fraud mitigation tools to mitigate risk while simplifying the user experience are paramount to differentiating your business. Ensure your payments partner can offer you a full suite of both payments and banking APIs that create additional revenue streams while providing a holistic experience for your end users.

    If we look beyond the basic payment transaction, consumers want options in how they finance their purchases. Integrating a point-of-sale lending solution API offers your merchants a valuable add-on service that improves their customers’ purchasing power and drives business growth by extending the customer relationship lifecycle.

    Recent growth metrics in the embedded lending market corroborate the demand for this functionality. The embedded lending market’s estimated worth is USD 6.35 Bn in 2024 with projections reaching USD 23.31 Bn by 2031.[i]

    Bringing it all together – offering consumers more value while growing your sales footprint

    A payments partner that can offer functionality beyond payment acceptance is crucial in a crowded market, but growing your geographic footprint is an equally important consideration. Selecting a partner that gives your business access to a diverse sales channel with specific vertical specialization increases your revenue potential. If you’re offering more value than your competitors, offer it in more locations. As your global footprint expands, enhance the consumer experience with global currency solutions that simplify the buying experience.

    When you’re building the blueprint for your success, it’s critical to select a proven partner that can help you build your long-term strategy. Embedding value around the payments experience is a win-win for you and your merchants. We can help. Backed by the strength and stability of U.S. Bank, we offer global payment expertise, so you can focus on expanding your business capabilities and providing more value for your stakeholders. For more information, fill out our short form to connect with us.

    [i] Coherent Market Insights

  • Consumers Are Struggling to Pay Their Credit Card Bills on Time, J.D. Power Finds

    Consumers Are Struggling to Pay Their Credit Card Bills on Time, J.D. Power Finds

    Consumers may not be racking up more revolving credit card debt than they did in 2023, but their ability to pay their bills on time is coming under pressure, according to a report released early Thursday by J.D. Power and Associates.

    Consumers say they are having a harder time paying their bills, including their credit card bills, on time in 2024 than they did in 2023, the report says. On a five-point scale, consumers’ ability to pay their bills on time fell to 4.26 in 2024 from 4.29 a year ago.

    Issuers of bank-branded and co-branded cards with no annual fees have seen the steepest decline in cardholders’ ability to pay, the report says. By contrast, issuers that offer products centered on helping consumers build their credit scores are seeing fewer late payments, the report says.

    J.D. Power measures financial health by considering consumers’ spending-to-savings ratio, creditworthiness, and safety-net items, such as insurance coverage.

    Another factor influencing the uptick in late payments is that many consumers are finding their income no longer goes as far as it once did. “Cardholders are reporting less of the ability for income to cover spending and lower levels of savings than in prior years, all of which impacts their ability to cover monthly financial obligations,” John Cabell, managing director of payments intelligence for J.D. Power, says by email.

    One way for card issuers to reduce late payments is to attract more customers looking to consolidate or pay down their debt. These customers tend to be more financially healthy, according to J.D. Power. To achieve that goal, issuers can build awareness for their debt-management tools, the researcher says.

    “Issuers should make [debt-management] tools readily available in digital channels and provide proactive communications to cardholders to build awareness and engagement of debt-management tools,” Cabell says.

    Among financially healthy cardholders, those with airline-rewards cards tend to be the healthiest. Some 40% of airline-rewards cardholders have revolving debt, compared to 51% of cardholders without airline-rewards cards.

    “Rewards products tend to attract people who are transacting to accumulate points, miles, or cashback. These consumers also tend to have less revolving debt and are therefore more influenced by the allure of rewards than low interest rates,” Cabell says. “Many cardholders with debt use value cards as their primary card, which have no rewards, no annual fees, and have low interest rates and balance-transfer features.”

    Large issuers have the resources to offer richer rewards, which attract financially healthy customers and in turn puts smaller issuers that can’t offer similar rewards at a disadvantage.

    Or, as Cabell sums it up: “The largest issuers tend to have prominent, attractive rewards cards that attract financially healthy consumers for primary card use. As a result, smaller issuers have fewer financially healthy card customers and a larger customer base using value cards.”

  • Worldline Adds Flexible Pricing for ISVs

    Worldline Adds Flexible Pricing for ISVs

    The demand for more flexible pricing from independent software vendors using Worldline’s payment-processing services has spurred a new pricing model.

    Dubbed FlexPricing, the feature enables ISVs to adapt their pricing strategies to best suit them, Worldline says. Among the capabilities: charging a percentage fee on bank transfer transactions, adding custom fees, and letting Worldline handle all billing duties.

    In detail, the percentage fee can be attached to automated clearing house transactions, and the custom fees could be annual fees tied to a monthly software-as-a-service product or a one-time integration fee, Worldline suggests.

    If billing is assigned to Worldline, it could reduce some operational complexities for ISVs, the company says, with consolidated statements for clients.

    Worldline says ISVs have asked for this capability and FlexPricing is in direct response to that. “It’s a comprehensive solution that can adapt to various business models and market conditions,” Justin Passalaqua, chief executive, North America, at Worldline Merchant Services, says in a statement.

    “As payments become increasingly integrated into consumer-facing platforms, ISVs and other providers are looking for ways to generate incremental revenue from the added consumer value of an embedded payment,” says Thad Peterson, strategic advisor at Datos Insights. “Sharing revenue with the ISV adds incremental value to their offering, and it creates an opportunity to share success with their customers.  That can make for a sticky relationship where the ISV is reluctant to change providers if their revenue streams are at risk.”

    The Worldline move lines up with ISVs awakening to the benefits and greater potential residual-based revenue streams, says Cliff Gray, principal of Gray Consulting Ventures LLC. “The IT industry has long been stuck on legacy licensing and maintenance-contract models that ignored the revenue potential of transaction-based models, but they are catching up quickly,” Gray tell Digital Transactions News. “For Worldline and other processors embracing the ISV, the goal is driving merchant adoption—but they’ll need to carefully manage the share with the ISV, lest they be detrimental to their own revenue streams.”

    The Worldline move comes as ISVs continue to cement their positions as channels to provide payment services to merchants. Pricing is one component of that relationship, with communication and setting expectations also vital, as observers outlined in a recent Digital Transactions News article.

Digital Transactions